Jorge Solorzano Lopez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al
| Jorge Solorzano Lopez |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and Merrick Garland |
| 2:2021cv02608 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Otis D Wright |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Merrick Garland, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Jorge Solorzano Lopez. (Damast, Sabrina) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jorge Solorzano Lopez. (Damast, Sabrina) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Jorge Solorzano Lopez, identifying Jorge Solorzano Lopez. (Damast, Sabrina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-30985472 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Jorge Solorzano Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Attorney Sabrina Damast added to party Jorge Solorzano Lopez(pty:pla))(Damast, Sabrina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
