John Adams v. Andrew M. Saul
| JOHN ADAMS |
| Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew M. Saul |
| 2:2021cv02642 |
| March 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Kenly Kiya Kato. New Case Number 8:21-cv-00578-FLA-KK. (car) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by PLAINTIFF JOHN ADAMS. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFF JOHN ADAMS, (Williams-Bronner, Jessica) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by PLAINTIFF JOHN ADAMS. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOHN ADAMS. (Williams-Bronner, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by PLAINTIFF JOHN ADAMS. (Attorney Jessica Elizabeth Williams-Bronner added to party JOHN ADAMS(pty:pla))(Williams-Bronner, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
