Jennifer Thurber v. Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Jennifer Thurber
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv02704
Filed: March 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2021 Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber. (Shvarts, Michelle)
April 8, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M Saul. (Attorney Marla K. Letellier added to party Andrew M Saul(pty:dft))(Letellier, Marla)
April 1, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber, upon Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber served on 3/31/2021, answer due 7/29/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Shvarts, Michelle)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
March 30, 2021 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew M Saul. (hr)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
March 30, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa)
March 29, 2021 Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber. (Shvarts, Michelle)
March 29, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber, (Shvarts, Michelle)
March 29, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Jennifer Thurber. (Shvarts, Michelle)
March 29, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber. (Shvarts, Michelle)
March 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Jennifer Thurber. (Attorney Michelle J Shvarts added to party Jennifer Thurber(pty:bkmov))(Shvarts, Michelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennifer Thurber v. Andrew M. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Thurber
Represented By: Michelle J Shvarts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Marla K. Letellier
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?