Nehemiah Kong v. FPL, LLC
Nehemiah Kong |
FPL,LLC and DOES 1-10 |
2:2021cv02713 |
March 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
John E McDermott |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike the Counterclaim for Declaratory Relief Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim #9 filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong. Motion set for hearing on 10/18/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Motion In Support of Motion to Strike, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order) (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against Nehemiah Kong filed by Defendant FPL,LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Maheshwari, Kumar) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Nehemiah Kong, re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #7 served on 4/5/2021. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by June 11, 2021. (tj) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) |
Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FPL,LLC. (Edmondson, J) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Nehemiah Kong in Ventura Superior Court on 2/18/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil) |
Filing 1 [NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by counsel as COMPLAINT] Receipt No: ACACDC- 31007746 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FPL,LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint) (Attorney J Curtis Edmondson added to party FPL,LLC(pty:dft))(Edmondson, J) Modified by Clerk on 3/30/2021 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.