Wendi McNeese v. M.R.S. Associates Inc.
Plaintiff: Wendi McNeese
Defendant: M.R.S. Associates Inc and M.R.S. Associates Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv02830
Filed: April 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for July 12, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before June 28, 2021. (iv)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
May 19, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-02830 JFW(MAAx). (rn)
April 29, 2021 Filing 14 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Martin, George)
April 29, 2021 Filing 13 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr)
April 27, 2021 Filing 12 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant M.R.S. Associates Inc., identifying Wendi McNeese. (Holt, Christopher)
April 27, 2021 Filing 11 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant M.R.S. Associates Inc. (Holt, Christopher)
April 27, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant M.R.S. Associates Inc..(Attorney Christopher D Holt added to party M.R.S. Associates Inc.(pty:dft))(Holt, Christopher)
April 27, 2021 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Wendi McNeese, upon Defendant M.R.S. Associates Inc. served on 4/6/2021, answer due 4/27/2021. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Martin, George)
April 2, 2021 Filing 8 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Martin, George)
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (hr)
April 2, 2021 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant M.R.S. Associates Inc. (lh)
April 2, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh)
April 1, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Martin, George)
April 1, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Wendi McNeese. (Martin, George)
April 1, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Wendi McNeese. (Martin, George)
April 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31030475 - Fee: $402. (Attorney George Thomas Martin, III added to party Wendi McNeese(pty:pla))(Martin, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wendi McNeese v. M.R.S. Associates Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendi McNeese
Represented By: George Thomas Martin, III
Represented By: Nicholas J Bontrager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M.R.S. Associates Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M.R.S. Associates Inc.
Represented By: Christopher D Holt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?