Jeff Steven Freitas v. Andrew Saul
| Jeff Steven Freitas |
| Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
| 2:2021cv02842 |
| April 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:21-cv-02842-SHK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn)
|
|
Filing 13
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney In Seon Jeong added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Jeong, In)
|
|
Filing 12
CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas. (McCabe, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 11
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 5/17/2021, answer due 7/16/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Veloz. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Civil Process Clerk, US Attorney's Office, Central District of California)(McCabe, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause no later than May 20, 2021, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Filing the proof of service by May 20, 2021, shall constitute compliance with this Order. (dc)
|
|
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. (see document for further details) (et)
|
|
Filing 8
60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (et)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (et)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (jtil)
|
|
Filing 5
Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas. (McCabe, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 4
Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas, (McCabe, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 3
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas. (McCabe, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 2
REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas. (McCabe, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Jeff Steven Freitas. (Attorney Patricia L McCabe added to party Jeff Steven Freitas(pty:pla))(McCabe, Patricia)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
