Groth v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Tyler H Groth
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2021cv02853
Filed: April 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Margo A Rocconi
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2021 Filing 15 JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, #14 . In accordance with the Court's April 30, 2021 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Defendant"), it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against plaintiff Tyler H. Groth ("Plaintiff"). It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff take nothing and Defendant shall have its costs of suit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson re: #12 MOTION to Dismiss Case. As a result of Plaintiff's failure to file an opposition, the Court grants Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. See Local Rule 7-12 ("The failure to file any required paper, or the failure to file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting or denial of the motion."). The Court dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice. See Missouri ex rel. Koster v. Harris, 847 F.3d 646, 656 (9th Cir. 2017). The Court will issue a Judgment consistent with this Order. (See document for details) (mrgo)
April 26, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE OF NON-RECEIPT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 9, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 8 and 12(b)(6); Memo of Points & Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Motion set for hearing on 5/10/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 6, 2021 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Order, Set/Reset Hearing #10 , Order #8 , Order #9 served on 4/6/21. (Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 5/17/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (mrgo)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
April 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (See document for details) (mrgo)
April 2, 2021 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 served on 4/2/21. (Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 2, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
April 2, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (car)
April 2, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Arjun P Rao counsel for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. Adding Arjun P. Rao as counsel of record for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attorney Arjun P Rao added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Rao, Arjun)
April 2, 2021 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., identifying JPMorgan Chase & Co.. (Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 2, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA - County of Los Angeles, case number 21IWSC00269 Receipt No: ACACDC-31034962 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Claim & Order to Go to Small Claims Court) (Attorney Shahrzad Guerami added to party JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Guerami, Shahrzad)
April 2, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT COMPLAINT against Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed by Plaintiff Tyler H Groth. Filed in State Court on 3/4/2021 Submitted with Attahment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Groth v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Represented By: Shahrzad Guerami
Represented By: Arjun P Rao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyler H Groth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?