Marguerite West v. 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc.
| Marguerite West and Willie James West |
| 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc., 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc. doing business as Guardian Rehabilitation Hospital and Does 1 to 50 |
| 2:2021cv02856 |
| April 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Otis D Wright |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Receipt of Remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court on 5/11/2021 (lc) |
| Filing 16 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court No. 21STCV03522. (lc) |
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: To date, no response to Court's Order to show cause why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction has been filed #12 . Upon consideration of the papers filed in support of removal, the Court finds that Defendant fails to establish the Courts subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Case Number 21STCV03522. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF Attorney David F. Beach instead of Attorney Stephen R. Hunter #10 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court ORDERS Defendant TO SHOW CAUSE in writing only, why this action should not be remanded for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Defendant shall respond to this OSC no later than May 5, 2021. No hearing will be held. Failure of Defendant to timely or adequately respond to this OSC may result in the remand of this matter without further warning. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Request for Substitution of Attorney. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Stephen R Hunter counsel for Defendant 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc.. Stephen R. Hunter is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Defendant. (Hunter, Stephen) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc. answer now due 5/9/2021, filed by Defendant 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc..(Hunter, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Miscellaneous Document #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Proof of Service (subsequent documents). Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Service filed by Defendant 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc. (Hunter, Stephen) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc., Does 1 to 50. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Marguerite West. Filed in State Court on 4/2/21 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc., (Hunter, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc.. (Hunter, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV03522 Receipt No: ACACDC-31035815 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Stephen R Hunter added to party 533 South Fairfax Ave., Inc.(pty:dft))(Hunter, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
