Moldex-Metric, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc.
| Moldex-Metric, Inc. |
| Honeywell, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv02911 |
| April 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Andre Birotte |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On May 18, 2021, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why it should not dismiss this action for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause re Lack of Prosecution on May 19, 2021. The Court deems that response satisfactory, and orders the Order to Show Cause discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cb) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc., upon Defendant Honeywell, Inc. served on 5/14/2021, answer due 6/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Roman Streitberger, Vice President in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
Filing 20
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order To Show Cause Regarding Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before 6/1/2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
|
| Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Honeywell, Inc. (lom) |
| Filing 18 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. as to Honeywell, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Letter re Attempted Service)(Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc., upon Defendant Honeywell, Inc. served on 4/23/2021, answer due 5/14/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Amy McLaren, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Honeywell, Inc. (bm) |
| Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Jacqueline M. Stykes to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc., designating Joseph M. Paunovich as local counsel #11 . (gk)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Adam J. DiClemente to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc., designating Joseph M. Paunovich as local counsel #10 . (gk)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Jacqueline M. Stykes to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31101829) filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Adam J. DiClemente to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. BCACDC-31101692) filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Paunovich, Joseph) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Jacquline M Stykes on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Adam J DiClemente on behalf of Plaintiff. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc., identifying none. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc. identifying none as Corporate Parent. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. (Paunovich, Joseph) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-31043687 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Moldex-Metric, Inc.. (Attorney Joseph M Paunovich added to party Moldex-Metric, Inc.(pty:pla))(Paunovich, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moldex-Metric, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Honeywell, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Moldex-Metric, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joseph M Paunovich |
| Represented By: | Joseph M. Paunovich |
| Represented By: | Adam J. DiClemente |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline M. Stykes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
