Wendy Flores v. Walmart Inc.
| Wendy Flores |
| Walmart Inc. and DOES 1-100, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv03082 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| John F Walter |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 20STCV26138, acknowledged on 5/5/2021. (iv) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv) |
Filing 10
ORDER RE: STIPULATION REMANDING BACK TO STATE COURT by Judge John F. Walter. Effective immediately, the matter herein shall be removed to the Superior Court of State of California, County of Los Angeles. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Colbert, Michael) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for May 10, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before April 28, 2021. (iv)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-03082 JFW (GJSx). (esa)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Wendy Flores in Los Angeles Superior Court on 7/10/2020, attached as Exhibit 3. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint Filed by Defendant Walmart Inc. in Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/8/2021, attached as Exhibit 10.(jtil) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., (Colbert, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Colbert, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV26138 Receipt No: ACACDC-31080491 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael F. Colbert ISO Notice of Removal of Action, #2 Notice of Lodgment of State Court File, #3 Exhibit Complaint, #4 Exhibit Civil Case Coversheet, #5 Exhibit Summons, #6 Exhibit Notice of Case Assignment, #7 Exhibit PI General Order, #8 Exhibit Certificate of Mailing, #9 Exhibit Proof of Service of Summons, #10 Exhibit Answer, #11 Exhibit Jury Demand) (Attorney Michael Colbert added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Colbert, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
