A.G. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Lidia Garcia, Adalmiro Garcia, G. G., Alexandria Garcia, D. G., A. G. and Lidia Garcia Espinoza |
| County of Los Angeles and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv03140 |
| April 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Thomas C Hurrell counsel for Defendant County of Los Angeles. Keimer E. Raymond is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Hurrell, Thomas) |
Filing 12
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. re Stipulation for Protective Order #11 (vm)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hurrell, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Lidia Garcia Espinoza.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit trial schedule)(Guizar, Humberto) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 6/28/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES; AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles.(Raymond, Keimer) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff A. G., Adalmiro Garcia, Lidia Garcia Espinoza, D. G., G. G., upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ruben K., Clerk in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/15/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY COMPLAINT against Defendants County of Los Angeles, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff A. G., Adalmiro Garcia, Lidia Garcia Espinoza, D. G., G. G. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 10/13/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Service to Adverse Party of Notice of Removal to Federal Court re: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Hurrell, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, (Hurrell, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Hurrell, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV39464 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 04/12/2021, receipt number 31097617), filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attorney Thomas C Hurrell added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft))(Hurrell, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
