Rachel Olmos et al v. T. Marzetti Company et al
Plaintiff: Michael Tramel and Rachel Olmos
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10, T. Marzetti Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv03159
Filed: April 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. #18 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Plaintiff has filed a First Amended Complaint. Dkt. #20 . Consequently, the Motion to Dismiss Class Action Complaint (the "Motion" (Dkt. #18 )) is MOOT, and the hearing on the Motion presently scheduled for September 20, 2021 is VACATED. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 3, 2021 Filing 20 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against DEFENDANT T. Marzetti Company amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by PLAINTIFFS Rachel Olmos, Michael Tramel (Attachments: #1 Appendix Redline Version of First Amended Complaint)(Clarkson, Ryan)
May 20, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE OF INTENTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IN LIEU OF OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS filed by PLAINTIFFS Rachel Olmos, Michael Tramel. (Mirzaie, Christina)
May 13, 2021 Filing 18 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Class Action Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company. Motion set for hearing on 9/20/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Declaration of Alexandra Aurisch in Support, #3 Exhibit A to Aurisch Decl., #4 Exhibit B to Aurisch Decl., #5 Exhibit C to Aurisch Decl., #6 Exhibit D to Aurisch Decl., #7 Exhibit E to Aurisch Decl., #8 Exhibit F to Aurisch Decl., #9 Exhibit G to Aurisch Decl., #10 Exhibit H to Aurisch Decl., #11 Exhibit I to Aurisch Decl., #12 Exhibit J to Aurisch Decl., #13 Exhibit K to Aurisch Decl., #14 Proposed Order re Motion to Dismiss, #15 Proposed Order re Request for Judicial Notice) (Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt: GRANTING #11 #15 Non-Resident Attorney Ronald Y. Rothstein APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T. Marzetti Company, designating Alexandra C. Aurisch as local counsel. (lt)
April 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt: GRANTING #12 Non-Resident Attorney Sean H. Suber APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T. Marzetti Company, designating Alexandra C. Aurisch as local counsel. (lt)
April 21, 2021 Filing 15 Amended APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ronald Y. Rothstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T. Marzetti Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Previously Paid on 4/19/2021, Receipt No. ACACDC-31137952) filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 20, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ronald Y. Rothstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T. Marzetti Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31137952) #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(d) Certificate of Good Standing not attached for every state court listed to which the applicant has been admitted. Other error(s) with document(s): A declaration is required regarding unavailability to provide GSC due to COVID-19. See Court's website on Coronavirus (COVID-19) Guidance. (lt)
April 19, 2021 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only, #10 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only,, #9 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on April 13, 2021 (Dkt. Nos. 1, 2 & 3) and April 19, 2021 (Dkt. Nos. 5, 6, 9 & 10). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Notice of Removal)(Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 19, 2021 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Sean H. Suber to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T. Marzetti Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31138039) filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 19, 2021 Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Ronald Y. Rothstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant T. Marzetti Company (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31137952) filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/2/2021. (tj)
April 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
April 14, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Sean H. Suber. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
April 14, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Ronald Y. Rothstein. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
April 14, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
April 14, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh)
April 13, 2021 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Rachel Olmos, Michael Tramel, upon Defendant T. Marzetti Company acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
April 13, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, T. Marzetti Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Rachel Olmos, Michael Tramel. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 2/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
April 13, 2021 Filing 4 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Initial Complaint filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company.(Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 13, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company, (Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company. (Aurisch, Alexandra)
April 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV05988 Receipt No: ACACDC-31103290 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant T. Marzetti Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Documents, #4 Declaration of Carl Stealey) (Attorney Alexandra Caroline Aurisch added to party T. Marzetti Company(pty:dft))(Aurisch, Alexandra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rachel Olmos et al v. T. Marzetti Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Marzetti Company
Represented By: Alexandra Caroline Aurisch
Represented By: Ronald Y. Rothstein
Represented By: Sean H. Suber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Tramel
Represented By: Christina Mirzaie
Represented By: Bahar Sodaify
Represented By: Ryan J Clarkson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Olmos
Represented By: Christina Mirzaie
Represented By: Bahar Sodaify
Represented By: Ryan J Clarkson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?