Geoff Winkler v. WLD Davis Holdings, LLC, a California limited liability company et al
| Receiver Geoff Winkler |
| The Elizabeth Lloyd Davis GST Exempt Trusts, f/b/o Alexander Thomas Davis and f/b/o Garrett Lloyd Davis, Does 1-10, inclusive, WLD Davis Holdings, LLC, a California limited liability company, The William Lloyd Davis Living Trust, WLD Davis Holdings, LLC and The Elizabeth Lloyd Davis GST Exempt Trusts |
| 2:2021cv03209 |
| April 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a), WITH PREJUDICE filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winkler. (Aspis, Norman) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winklerto Order to Show Cause, #12 (Aspis, Norman) |
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before July 16, 2021, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 10
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-05008 FMO(AFMx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick and Judge James V. Selna to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-03209-FMO (AFMx). Signed by Judge Fernando M. Olguin (aco)
|
| Filing 9 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants The Elizabeth Lloyd Davis GST Exempt Trusts, The William Lloyd Davis Living Trust, WLD Davis Holdings, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winkler. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-05008-FMO-AFM (Aspis, Norman) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winkler, identifying WLD Davis Holdings, LLC; The William Lloyd Davis Living Trust; The Elizabeth Lloyd Davis GST Exempt Trusts, f/b/o Alexander Thomas Davis and f/b/o Garrett Lloyd Davis; Essex Capital Corporation. (Aspis, Norman) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winkler. (Aspis, Norman) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winkler. (Aspis, Norman) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31113873 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Geoff Winkler. (Attorney Norman M Aspis added to party Geoff Winkler(pty:pla))(Aspis, Norman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
