Tawfiq Khan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
| Tawfiq Khan |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv03279 |
| April 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV09825, acknowledged on 5/28/2021. (iv) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The above-captioned action shall be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Scheduling Conference set for 7/1/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS #7 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC's deadline to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby extended to May 24, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Soheyl Tahsildoost in support, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Tawfiq Khan. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 3/12/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC identifying Daimler North America Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV09825 Receipt No: ACACDC-31125865 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
