United States of America v. $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| $100,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY |
| Heng Zhao |
| 2:2021cv03336 |
| April 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Steve Kim |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff United States of America, by Publication upon Defendant $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency last date of publication 5/25/2021, answer due 6/14/2021. Publication was made in the official government website (www.forfeiture.gov). (Whittlesey, Brent) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 , Claim #10 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #11 ,. The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Amended Answer re No. 11. 1)Due to Filer's Clerical error, Claimant Heng Seng was not added to the Docket and attorney was erroneously added to the defendant US Currency. Per Clerk's office procedures Clerk is authorized to correct these clerical errors. Claimant added and attorney termed only as to US Currency. Other error(s) with document(s): Note: To assist in a search for correct events, please use the "SEARCH" option for a "key word" to narrow the selection process. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 FIRST AMENDED ANSWER filed by Defendant $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency.(Liu, Zhao) |
| Filing 10 CLAIM filed by Defendant $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency. (Liu, Zhao) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency.(Attorney Zhao Liu added to party $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency(pty:dft))(Liu, Zhao) |
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv)
|
| Filing 7 WARRANT for seizure of $100,000.00 In U.S. Currency issued on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 signed verifiation page (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Whittlesey, Brent) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Warrant for Seizure on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Whittlesey, Brent) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Whittlesey, Brent) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attorney Brent A. Whittlesey added to party UNITED STATES OF AMERICA(pty:pla))(Whittlesey, Brent) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
