Princis B. Scott v. NewRez LLC et al
| Princis B. Scott |
| NewRez LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, NewRez LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv03499 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Property Damage |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Kenly Kiya Kato. New Case Number 5:21-cv-00736 JGB (KKx). (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant NewRez LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, identifying New Residential Investment Corp.. (Bryan, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino County Superior Court, case number CIVDS1936135 Receipt No: ACACDC-31176974 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant NewRez LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Joshua M Bryan added to party NewRez LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing(pty:dft))(Bryan, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
