Brian Whitaker v. Giorgio Armani Corporation
| Brian Whitaker |
| Giorgio Armani Corporation |
| 2:2021cv03512 |
| April 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Giorgio Armani Corporation identifying Giorgio Armani S.p.A. as Corporate Parent. (Reinhart, Jaclyn) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Giorgio Armani Corporation.(Attorney Jaclyn Marie Reinhart added to party Giorgio Armani Corporation(pty:dft))(Reinhart, Jaclyn) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Giorgio Armani Corporation served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS CSC - LAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE; Susie Vang- Customer Representative in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitakerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Order to Show Cause,, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (shb) |
Filing 8
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE EXERCISE OF SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION RE STATE LAW CLAIM by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim asserted in the Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than May 10, 2021. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (shb)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Giorgio Armani Corporation. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31178575 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
