Springfield Clinic, LLP v. Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff: Springfield Clinic, LLP
Defendant: Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv03595
Filed: April 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Ronald SW Lew
Referring Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2021 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Watson, Houston)
June 23, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc..(Watson, Houston)
June 11, 2021 Filing 10 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. answer now due 6/23/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP.(Jaeger, Michael)
May 24, 2021 Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. answer now due 6/14/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP.(Jaeger, Michael)
May 7, 2021 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP, upon Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. served on 5/3/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Oshin Harootoonian in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Jaeger, Michael)
April 28, 2021 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. (et)
April 28, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
April 28, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et)
April 28, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP, (Wilhelm, Zoe)
April 28, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP. (Wilhelm, Zoe)
April 28, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP. (Wilhelm, Zoe)
April 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31196785 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP. (Attorney Zoe K. Wilhelm added to party Springfield Clinic, LLP(pty:pla))(Wilhelm, Zoe)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Springfield Clinic, LLP v. Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Represented By: Houston Murphy Watson, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Springfield Clinic, LLP
Represented By: Michael Jaeger
Represented By: Zoe K. Wilhelm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?