Springfield Clinic, LLP v. Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
Springfield Clinic, LLP |
Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. |
2:2021cv03595 |
April 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald SW Lew |
Alka Sagar |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Watson, Houston) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc..(Watson, Houston) |
Filing 10 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. answer now due 6/23/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP.(Jaeger, Michael) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. answer now due 6/14/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP.(Jaeger, Michael) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP, upon Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. served on 5/3/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Oshin Harootoonian in compliance with statute not specified by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Jaeger, Michael) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (et) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP, (Wilhelm, Zoe) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP. (Wilhelm, Zoe) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP. (Wilhelm, Zoe) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31196785 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Springfield Clinic, LLP. (Attorney Zoe K. Wilhelm added to party Springfield Clinic, LLP(pty:pla))(Wilhelm, Zoe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Springfield Clinic, LLP v. Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Primex Clinical Laboratories, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Houston Murphy Watson, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Springfield Clinic, LLP | |
Represented By: | Michael Jaeger |
Represented By: | Zoe K. Wilhelm |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.