Kenneth Leonhardt v. JPMorgan Chase, N.A. et al
| Kenneth Leonhardi |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv03634 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Kenneth Leonhardt Kenneth Leonhardi. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Sonnenberg, Scott) |
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. answer now due 5/28/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A..(Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT plaintiff, having designated a defendant in the complaint by the incorrect name of defendant J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, a New York corporation and having discovered the true name of the defendant to be J.P. Morgan Chase National Corporate Services, Inc. a New York corporation amends the complaint by substituting the true name for the incorrect name wherever it appears in the complaint, filed by plaintiff Kenneth Leonhardi. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/24/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 2)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Kenneth Leonhardi. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/9/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (erroneously sued as "J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York corporation"), re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 04/29/2021. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (erroneously sued as "J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York corporation"), identifying JPMorgan Chase & Co., The Vanguard Group, Inc.. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (erroneously sued as "J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York corporation") identifying JPMorgan Chase & Co. as Corporate Parent. (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (erroneously sued as "J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York corporation"). (Bohmholdt, Karin) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV09110 Receipt No: ACACDC-31205665 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (erroneously sued as "J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York corporation"). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to JPMorgan Chase's Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 to JPMorgan Chase's Notice of Removal) (Attorney Karin Bohmholdt added to party JPMorgan Chase, N.A. (erroneously sued as "J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, a New York corporation")(pty:dft))(Bohmholdt, Karin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
