California Supreme Court et al v. Ringgold et al
| Michelle Cramton, Yvette Roland, Ross Viselman, Craig Matheny, Steven Moawad, Board of Trustees of the State Bar of California, Richard Honn, Jayne Kim, Thomas Miller, Kerri Riley, Ashod Mooradian, Barbara Field, Patrice Vallier-Glass, Vanessa Holton, Catherine Purcell, State Bar, State Bar Court, Melanie J. Lawrence and Agustin Hernandez |
| Law Offices of Nina R. Ringgold and Nina R. Ringgold |
| California Supreme Court |
| 2:2021cv03664 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 In response to the opening of this case, the Clerk issued a Notice to Filer of Deficiencies in Attorney Case Opening. The Notice indicated that unless counsel corrected the identified discrepancy within two business days, the docket for this case number would be closed and no further filings would be permitted under this case number. Counsel has not corrected the discrepancy. Accordingly, this case is now closed. No further filings may be made under this case number, except, if applicable, to request a refund of fees using a Form G-124, Application for Refund of Fees. Should you wish to pursue this action, a new case must be filed and a new case number issued. (Case Terminated.) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Miscellaneous Document #1 . The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney James Jou Chang on behalf of Plaintiff State Bar (Attorney James Jou Chang added to party State Bar(pty:pla))(Chang, James) |
| Filing 1 Letter to Clerk - Notice of Pre-Filing Order Barring Removal (Chang, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
