Van Schwartzman v. South Coast Tax Resolution et al
| Van Schwartzman |
| Ryan Eric Born, South Coast Tax Resolution, Sandra Wolfe and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| Roes |
| 2:2021cv03723 |
| May 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| George H Wu |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Initial Case Management Order In A Civil Rights Case #17 was inadvertently entered on the wrong case. Please disregard in its entirety. (es) |
Filing 17
[NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED DOCKETED ON WRONG CASE #18 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (See document for details and deadlines.) (es) Modified on 6/14/2021 (es).
|
| Filing 16 Receipt of Order of Remand filed. (mrgo) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has received and reviewed Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Van Schwartzman's motion for reconsideration of the remand order ("Motion"). See EFC No. 14. The Court ordered this action to be remanded to state court because neither the original complaint (see ECF No. 1-1) nor the cross-complaint (see ECF No. 1-5) contained a claim or a cognizable issue under federal law. See ECF No. 11. Van Schwartman's Motion - while claiming that the pleadings: (1) state "facts of federal issues," (2) consist of state law which "turn on federal law, and (3) concern matters where the federal law completely preempts the area fails to: (1) reference any facts in the pleadings which actually raise any federal issues, (2) show how the state law causes of action actually turn on federal law, and/or (3) identify any area covered in the state causes of action which fall within a federal preemption situation. Thus, Van Schwartzman has not set forth a basis for reconsideration of the Court's remand order. Hence, the Motion is denied. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 14 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Order to Remand Case to State Court, #11 , Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings #10 PLAINTIFF/CROSS-DEFENDANT VAN SCHWARTZMANS NOTICE OF, AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF REMAND ORDERS; AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A STAY OF REMAND ORDERS. [FEDERAL QUESTION filed by Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant Van Schwartzman. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 13 PLAINTIFF/CROSS-DEFENDANT VAN SCHWARTZMANS NOTICE OF, AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF REMAND ORDERS; AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, A STAY OF REMAND ORDERS. [FEDERAL QUESTION re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Order to Remand Case to State Court, #11 , Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court (CV-103) - optional html form #12 (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT; VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu: remanding case to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 21STCV01307. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/3/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 6/17/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Counter Defendant Van Schwartzman, Plaintiff Van Schwartzman. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Cross-Defendant Van Schwartzman, identifying Van Go Woodworks, Inc.. (Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #5 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Other Filings > Miscellaneous Filings > Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71); Other Filings > Notice > Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. Other error(s) with document(s): The civil cover sheet and certificate/notice of interested parties shall be separate entries on the docket using the correct events indicated in this notice of deficiency. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($402 paid on 04/28/2021, receipt number ACACDC-31228865), filed by Cross-Defendant Van Schwartzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification, and Notice of Interested Parties, CV-30., #2 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71)(Kamath, Reshma) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COUNTERCLAIM (FILED AS CROSS-COMPLAINT IN STATE COURT) against Counter Defendants Van Schwartzman, Roes 1-10; Jury Demanded, filed by Counter Claimant Sandra Wolfe, Ryan Eric Born, South Coast Tax Resolution. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 2/18/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1-5) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV01307 Receipt No: ACACDC-31228865 - Fee: $402, filed by Cross-Defendant Van Schwartzman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit complaint, #2 Exhibit Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Summons, #4 Exhibit Demand for Jury Trial, #5 Exhibit cross-complaint, #6 Exhibit Motion-to-Strike, #7 Exhibit Counsel Reshma Kamath Declaration, #8 Exhibit cross-plaintiffs' opposition to motion to strike, #9 Exhibit declaration of cross-plaintiffs' attorney, #10 Exhibit judge's order dated April 22, 2021, #11 Exhibit proposed, unfiled, withdrawn first amended complaint) (Attorney Reshma Kamath added to party Van Schwartzman(pty:crd))(Kamath, Reshma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
