Paul Bereswill v. Clutchpoints, Inc.
| Paul Bereswill |
| Clutchpoints, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv03737 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Dismissal) (mrgo) |
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court finds that Plaintiff has abandoned his claims by failing to comply with the Court's Order. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with a Court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see also Yourish, 191 F.3d at 986-88; Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260. (See document for details). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson re: Notice of Settlement #12 . The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill. (Sanders, Craig) |
|
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before June 22, 2021, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (lom)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-03737 PA(JCx). (rn) |
| Filing 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 9 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill, upon Defendant Clutchpoints, Inc. served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gary Damini managing agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Clutchpoints, Inc. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill, identifying Barshay Sanders, PLLC, Craig B. Sanders, Clutchpoints, Inc.. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Paul Bereswill. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill. (Sanders, Craig) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31223566 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Paul Bereswill. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Attorney Craig B Sanders added to party Paul Bereswill(pty:pla))(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Paul Bereswill v. Clutchpoints, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Bereswill | |
| Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clutchpoints, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
