Michael J. Holmes v. Nedrudee Liu
Michael J. Holmes |
Nedrudee Liu |
2:2021cv03745 |
April 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Virginia A Phillips |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTIFICATION from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 21-55635. (yl) |
Filing 12 ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: The court has considered the motion and the motion is DENIED. #10 (yl) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Michael J. Holmes. Appeal of Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #7 Filed On: 5/12/21; Entered On: 5/13/21; In forma pauperis is pending. (mat) |
Filing 10 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by plaintiff Michael J. Holmes. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Order) (mat) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. In accordance with the Order Dismissing Action for Lack of Jurisdiction, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. #8 (es) |
Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (es) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: denying #3 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (yl) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (droj) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Nedrudee Liu. (car) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Nedrudee Liu (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Nedrudee Liu. Case assigned to Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Michael J. Holmes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/4/2021: #2 Summons) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michael J. Holmes v. Nedrudee Liu | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael J. Holmes | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nedrudee Liu | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.