Scott Mednick et al v. Virtual Sonics, Inc.
| Scott Mednick and Skyler Mednick |
| Virtual Sonics, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv03755 |
| May 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #20 filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiffs' Objections to Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Plaintiffs' Objections to Declaration of Sasha Frid)(Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE filed by Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc.. Notice of Errata re Docket Nos 20 and 21 (Frid, Alexander) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc., re SEALED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION re Order on Motion to Seal Case, #18 #21 served on June 17, 2021. (Frid, Alexander) |
| Filing 21 SEALED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION re Order on Motion to Seal Case, #18 filed by Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/21/2021 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Unredacted Document Exhibit A to Declaration of A. Sasha Frid)(Frid, Alexander) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/21/2021 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Redacted Document Exhibit 1 to Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Declaration Declaration of A. Sasha Frid, #4 Redacted Document Exhibit A to Declaration of A. Sasha Frid, #5 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order) (Frid, Alexander) |
| Filing 19 Request for Clarification of Order on Ex Parte Application filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick re: Order on Motion to Seal Case, #18 (Edelson, Rebecca) |
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING EX PARTE MOTION AND ORDERINGREDACTIONS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The application is DISMISSED as moot. The parties have essentially agreed to follow the ordinary procedures of this Court under Local Rule 79: file a redacted version of the relevant materials (as agreed-upon) for public view, and apply for leave to file the unredacted materials under seal. (See Minute Order for further details) dismissing #15 APPLICATION to Seal Case (vm)
|
| Filing 17 Opposition Opposition re: APPLICATION to Seal Case to Require Defendant to Redact the Stock Purchase Agreement or File it Under Seal #15 Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to Require Defendant to Redact the Stock Purchase Agreement or File it Under Seal filed by Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc.. (Frid, Alexander) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: EX PARTE MOTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Defendants submission will be due by 3 p.m. on Friday, June 11. To facilitate consideration of the ex parte application and to avoid prejudiceto any party, the Court sua sponte extends the time by which Defendant must respond to the underlying complaint (by answer or, apparently, motion) to Friday, June 18. (See Minute Order for further details) re: APPLICATION to Seal Case to Require Defendant to Redact the Stock Purchase Agreement or File it Under Seal #15 . (vm)
|
| Filing 15 APPLICATION to Seal Case to Require Defendant to Redact the Stock Purchase Agreement or File it Under Seal filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Ex Parte Application, #2 Declaration of Rebecca Edelson, #3 Exhibit A to Rebecca Edelson Declaration, #4 Exhibit B to Rebecca Edelson Declaration, #5 Declaration of Scott Mednick, #6 Declaration of Skyler Mednick, #7 Proposed Order) (Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for final disposition re: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #11 , Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #13 (esa) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick. (Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Raymond J Nhan on behalf of Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick (Attorney Raymond J Nhan added to party Scott Mednick(pty:pla), Attorney Raymond J Nhan added to party Skyler Mednick(pty:pla))(Nhan, Raymond) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Frid, Alexander) |
| Filing 10 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The deadline for Defendant to file its response to Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby extended from May 26, 2021 to June 11, 2021. re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #7 (vm)
|
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick, upon Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc. served on 5/5/2021, answer due 6/11/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Betty J. William, Agent for Service of Procss in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Virtual Sonics, Inc. answer now due 6/11/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Alexander S Frid added to party Virtual Sonics, Inc.(pty:dft))(Frid, Alexander) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Virtual Sonics, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 11-C) (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick, identifying Virtual Sonics, Inc.; Julian Soule; Jeremy Soule; David Glass; Philip Quartararo; Peter Ziegler; Mark Remeikis, Co-Trustee of the Albert A. Remeikis Irrevocable Trust; I. Martin Pompadur; Dr. and Mrs. William Scott. (Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick. (Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick. (Edelson, Rebecca) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31228771 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Scott Mednick, Skyler Mednick. (Attorney Rebecca J Edelson added to party Scott Mednick(pty:pla), Attorney Rebecca J Edelson added to party Skyler Mednick(pty:pla))(Edelson, Rebecca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
