Frank Italiane v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
| Frank Italiane |
| C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated |
| 2:2021cv03849 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF FRANK ITALIANE'S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #19 . IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Stipulation of Dismissal of Plaintiff Frank Italiane's Claims With Prejudice is GRANTED. 2. Each party is to bear their own fees and costs. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Newman, Daniell) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION FOR STAY OF DISCOVERY AND ALL PRETRIAL DEADLINES TO ACCOMMODATE FINALIZATION OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Stay Case #17 . (mrgo)
|
| Filing 17 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Finalization of Settlement filed by defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Newman, Daniell) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: granting #11 Request to Substitute Attorney. Daniell K. Newman is substituted in place of attorney Richard B. North for defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. Attorney Richard B. North, Jr terminated. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Court is in receipt of the transfer order issued by the MDL Court for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The parties are ordered to meet and confer no later than May 19, 2021 to discuss case management and scheduling issues. Following their meet and confer, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report no later than May 26, 2021. The Joint Status Report shall include the following: (see document for details). (mrgo)
|
| Filing 13 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated, identifying Becton, Dickinson and Company. (Newman, Daniell) |
| Filing 12 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniell K Newman counsel for Defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. Adding Daniell K. Newman as counsel of record for C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.. (Newman, Daniell) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Daniell K. Newman in place of attorney Richard B. North filed by defendants Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Daniell K Newman added to party Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated(pty:dft), Attorney Daniell K Newman added to party C R Bard Incorporated(pty:dft)) (Newman, Daniell) |
| Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 47 Filed 7/16/20, Document 21540, Case 2:15-md-02641-DGC(SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS) (lh) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (lh) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 5 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from Arizona |
| Remark: Transferring Case to the Central District of California via electronic transfer. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 5/7/2021.] |
|
Filing 4
AMENDED FINAL SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/26/21. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 5/7/2021.]
|
|
Filing 3
*AMENDED by Doc. #4 --FINAL SUGGESTION OF REMAND AND TRANSFER ORDER. See Order for Details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 4/20/21. (MAP) Modified on 4/29/2021 (SJF). [Transferred from Arizona on 5/7/2021.]
|
| Filing 2 This case has been assigned to the Honorable David G. Campbell, with member case number: CV-19-3348-PHX-DGC. This case is included in MDL-2641. All future pleadings or documents should be filed in the Lead Case: 2:15-md-2641-DGC. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 5/7/2021.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 400.00, receipt number 0970-16942828 filed by Frank Italiane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(MAP) [Transferred from Arizona on 5/7/2021.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
