Teresa Gutierrez et al v. Sprint Corporation
| MICHAEL CAMOUS, TERESA GUTIERREZ and Michael Camou |
| Sprint Corporation |
| 2:2021cv03865 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kristine McAlister Brown to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Sprint Corporation and designating Lisa Garcia as local counsel #14 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (lc)
|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Teresa Gutierrez, Michael Camou, upon Defendant Sprint Corporation served on 6/8/2021, answer due 7/29/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lauren Muzik, Administrative Assistant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Bernal, Alison) |
| Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kristine McAlister Brown to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Sprint Corporation (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31542253) filed by Defendant Sprint Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Garcia, Lisa) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Sprint Corporation answer now due 7/29/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Sprint Corporation.(Attorney Lisa L Garcia added to party Sprint Corporation(pty:dft))(Garcia, Lisa) |
|
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (pg)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 21-01 by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson to the calendar of Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:21-cv-03865-FLA-PVCx. (aco)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Davina C Okonkwo on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Lori G. Kier on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Joseph G Sauder on behalf of Plaintiffs. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Sprint Corporation. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs MICHAEL CAMOUS, TERESA GUTIERREZ. (Bernal, Alison) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs MICHAEL CAMOUS, TERESA GUTIERREZ, (Bernal, Alison) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs MICHAEL CAMOUS, TERESA GUTIERREZ. (Bernal, Alison) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31252217 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs TERESA GUTIERREZ, MICHAEL CAMOUS. (Attorney Alison M. Bernal added to party MICHAEL CAMOUS(pty:pla), Attorney Alison M. Bernal added to party TERESA GUTIERREZ(pty:pla))(Bernal, Alison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
