Davione Eugene Wiley v. Christian Pfeiffer
| Davione Eugene Wiley |
| Christian Pfeiffer |
| 2:2021cv03874 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Karen E Scott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Petitioner Davione Eugene Wiley. (Spolin, Aaron) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: It is hereby ordered that Respondent is GRANTED to July 10, 2021, to file a Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and to July 25, 2021, to file an Answer to the Petition in the alternative. #6 (es)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Errata filed by Respondent Christian Pfeiffer. (Thakor, Shezad) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Christian Pfeiffer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thakor, Shezad) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Deputy Attorney General Shezad H. Thakor on behalf of Respondent Christian Pfeiffer. (Attorney Shezad Hanif Thakor added to party Christian Pfeiffer(pty:res))(Thakor, Shezad) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney General's Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (See order.) (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent Form CV11B) (jdo)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Petitioner Davione Eugene Wiley. (Spolin, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (28 USC 2254), Receipt No. ACACDC-31254179 for $5 filing fee, filed by Petitioner Davione Eugene Wiley. (Attorney Aaron Spolin added to party Davione Eugene Wiley(pty:pet))(Spolin, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Davione Eugene Wiley v. Christian Pfeiffer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Christian Pfeiffer | |
| Represented By: | Shezad Hanif Thakor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Davione Eugene Wiley | |
| Represented By: | Aaron Spolin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
