American International Industries v. Brenntag Specialties, Inc., et al
American International Industries |
Does 1 through 50 and Brenntag Specialties, Inc. |
2:2021cv03888 |
May 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
R Gary Klausner |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. According to court records, plaintiff(s) filed a First Amended Complaint #18 . Therefore, defendant's Motion to Dismiss #11 , is denied as moot. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Brenntag Specialties, Inc., Does amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff American International Industries (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Invoice, #2 Exhibit B - Invoice, #3 Exhibit C - Indemnification Agreement, #4 Exhibit D - List)(Roje, Alexandra) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #15 Non-Resident Attorney Richard G Placey APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc., designating Phillip Allan T Perez as local counsel. (jp) |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner granting #14 Non-Resident Attorney Georgette Castner APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc., designating Phillip Allan T Perez as local counsel. (jp) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Richard G. Placey to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31463105) filed by defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 14 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Georgette Castner to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31463002) filed by defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 9/13/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 9/20/2021 at 9:00 am. (sw) |
Filing 12 (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint #11 , filed on 06/11/2021 and noticed for hearing on 08/02/2021 at 9:00 am, HAS BEEN ADVANCED TO 07/19/2021 at 9:00 am. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice filed by defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 8/2/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss) (Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 10 DENIED BY ORDER OF TEH COURT by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Stipulation for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint and Defendant's Time to Respond to Amended Complaint #9 . The Stipulation is DENIED. (jp) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint - (Discovery) filed by defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 8 NOTICE filed by Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc.. of Law Firm Name Change (Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Brenntag Specialties, Inc. answer now due 6/11/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc..(Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (esa) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation identifying Brenntag SE as Corporate Parent. (Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, identifying Brenntag Specialties, LLC f/k/a Brenntag Specialties, Inc.; Brenntag North America, Inc.; Brenntag Group; Brenntag; SE; Whittaker Clark & Daniels, Inc.; Brilliant National Services, Inc.. (Perez, Phillip) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV13086 Receipt No: ACACDC-31256548 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Phillip Allan Trajan Perez in Support of Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc.'s Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Phillip Allan Trajan Perez added to party Brenntag Specialties, Inc., a Delaware Corporation(pty:dft))(Perez, Phillip) |
COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff American International Industries, upon Defendant Brenntag Specialties, Inc. served on 4/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation, Agent for Service of Process by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (submitted as document 1, p. 33) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Brenntag Specialties, Inc, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff American International Industries. (filed in state court 4/6/21, submitted as document 1, p. 9) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.