Devon Andrew Watson v. Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Devon Andrew Watson
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 2:2021cv04036
Filed: May 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: James V Selna
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2021 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
June 8, 2021 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 6/2/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to reception area, or mail room. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to at Post Office available for pick up. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Office of Regional Counsel, reception area, or mail room,. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rohlfing, Lawrence)
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
May 17, 2021 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (hr)
May 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
May 14, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
May 13, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson, (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
May 13, 2021 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
May 13, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
May 13, 2021 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson. (Rohlfing, Lawrence)
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Devon Andrew Watson. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party Devon Andrew Watson(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Devon Andrew Watson v. Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devon Andrew Watson
Represented By: Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?