Nicholas Green v. Board of Regents of the University of California et al
| Nicholas Green |
| Officer Dodd (#389), Officer McIntire (#354), Officer K. Gutierrez, Officer Brox (#388), Board of Regents of the University of California, Sergeant Paak (#320), William Dunne, Officer Jeffrey Chobanian, Bill Clayton, Sergeant Paak, Officer McIntire, Officer Dodd, Officer Brox and Does 1 through 10 inclusive |
| 2:2021cv04077 |
| May 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
(In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 7/13/2021, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp)
|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant McIntire served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Adrian Anderson #313 - Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Officer McIntire (#354) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant Dodd served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Adrian Anderson #313 - Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Officer Dodd (#389) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant Brox served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Adrian Anderson #313 - Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Officer Brox (#388) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant Jeffrey Chobanian served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Adrian Anderson #313 - Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Officer Jeffrey Chobanian in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant K. Gutierrez served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Adrian Anderson #313 - Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Officer K. Gutierrez in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant Board of Regents of the University of California served on 6/16/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Steven Poblete - Receptionist/Guard-Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Board of Regents for the University of California - Office of the President in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, upon Defendant Paak served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sgt. Adrian Anderson #313 - Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Sergeant Paak (#320) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Board of Regents of the University of California, Brox, Jeffrey Chobanian, Bill Clayton, Dodd, William Dunne, K. Gutierrez, McIntire, Paak. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green. (McRae, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green, (McRae, Lauren) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green. (McRae, Lauren) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31298996 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Nicholas Green. (Attorney Lauren Khali McRae added to party Nicholas Green(pty:pla))(McRae, Lauren) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
