Josie Lopez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
| Josie Lopez |
| Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv04114 |
| May 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| John F Walter |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2022 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motionsin Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 4/15/2022 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 4/26/2022 8:30 AM. (iv)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on July 19, 2021 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: January 10, 2021. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: January 14, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 22 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4-7 days, filed by Plaintiff Josie Lopez.. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 20 DECLARATION of David N. Barry, Esq. Regarding Failure to File Proposed Statements of Decision filed by Plaintiff Josie Lopez. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION of Soheyl Tahsildoost Regarding Failure to File Proposed Statements of Decision filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
|
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for July 19, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before July 9, 2021. (iv)
|
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC'S MOTION TO COMPEL BINDING ARBITRATION [filed 5/25/2021; Docket No. #11 ] by Judge John F. Walter. Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED. Defendant shall file its Answer on or before July 8, 2021. The Court orders lead counsel for each of the parties to file a declaration on or before June 28, 2021, explaining the basis for their failure to file the Proposed Statements of Decision, in light of their statements under oath that they had read the Court's Standing Order. (iv)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY Reply In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 15 Opposition In Opposition to re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 filed by Plaintiff Josie Lopez. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 14 DECLARATION of David N. Barry, Esq. Per Standing Order filed by Plaintiff Josie Lopez. (Barry, David) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Compel #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Proposed orders not lodged with a main document shall be electronically lodged as an attachment to a Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #11 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 6/28/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Soheyl Tahsildoost in support, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration: Complaint filed on or About April 9, 2021, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration: Plaintiff's Motor Vehicle Lease Agreement) (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Soheyl Tahsildoost filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 9 Text Entry Order STRIKING the MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC #7 . The hearing date is untimely and violates paragraph 5(a) of the Court's Standing Order filed on May 19, 2021 #6 . Counsel shall read the Court's Standing Order in its entirety before refiling any motion.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration #7 filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 7 *Stricken* NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 7/12/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Soheyl Tahsildoost in support, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) Modified on 5/25/2021 (sr). |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Josie Lopez. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/9/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC identifying Daimler North America Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV13695 Receipt No: ACACDC-31309536 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Soheyl Tahsildoost added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:dft))(Tahsildoost, Soheyl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
