Salvador Alvarez v. The Nue Co USA, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Salvador Alvarez
Defendant: The Nue Co USA, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv04115
Filed: May 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Salvador Alvarez. (Smith, Evan)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTIONby Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: In light of the Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement #12 , the Court orders the action dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 30 days from the date of this Order if settlement not completed. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to FRCP. 41, which does not require approval of the Court. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
July 1, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Salvador Alvarez. (Smith, Evan)
July 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT THE NUE CO USA, INC'S TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT TO JULY 1, 2021 #10 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha (lc) Modified on 7/1/2021 (lc).
June 28, 2021 Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form, #9 filed by Defendant The Nue Co USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tsai, Shelby)
June 28, 2021 Filing 9 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #7 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by Tuesday, June 29, 2021. (lc)
June 24, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Second Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer has created an Erroneous Image of the docket event used within a "box" in the Middle of title page between line 12-16. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
June 23, 2021 Filing 7 (STRICKEN PER 6/28/2021 COURT'S G112B RESPONSE ORDER DOCKET NO. 9). Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Nue Co USA, Inc. answer now due 7/1/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery), Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #6 filed by Defendant The Nue Co USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tsai, Shelby) Modified on 6/28/2021 (lc).
May 20, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Nue Co USA, Inc. answer now due 6/24/2021, filed by Defendant The Nue Co USA, Inc..(Tsai, Shelby)
May 18, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
May 18, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car)
May 17, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, inclusive, The Nue Co USA, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Salvador Alvarez. Filed in State Court on 4/13/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Notice of Removal #1 (car)
May 17, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Nue Co USA, Inc., identifying The Nue Co LTD. (Tsai, Shelby)
May 17, 2021 Filing 2 [CIVIL COVER SHEET] FILED AS NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV14052 with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 05/17/2021, receipt number 31309805), filed by Defendant The Nue Co USA, Inc..(Tsai, Shelby) Modified on 5/18/2021 (car).
May 17, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV14052 Receipt No: ACACDC-31309805 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant The Nue Co USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint) (Attorney Shelby Pasarell Tsai added to party The Nue Co USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Tsai, Shelby)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salvador Alvarez v. The Nue Co USA, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Nue Co USA, Inc.
Represented By: Shelby Pasarell Tsai
Represented By: Robert Cragin McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Salvador Alvarez
Represented By: Evan Jason Smith
Represented By: Ryan P Cardona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?