Za Zen Enterprises, LLC v. Grubhub Inc. et al
| Za-Zen Enterprises, LLC , Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, doing business as Shibumi and Za-Zen Enterprises, LLC Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Shibumi |
| Grubhub Inc. and Does 1 through 100 |
| 2:2021cv04131 |
| May 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SUBMIT DISPUTE TO ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS #13 by Judge R. Gary Klausner that: (1) The Stipulation is GRANTED; (2) The parties shall submit this entire dispute to arbitration in accordance with the parties' arbitration agreement; and (3) All proceedings in this action shall be stayed pending completion of arbitration. (jp)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending completion of arbitration filed by defendant Grubhub Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Grubhub Inc. answer now due 6/11/2021, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by defendant Grubhub Inc..(Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Grubhub Inc. answer now due 6/1/2021, filed by defendant Grubhub Inc..(Lipshutz, Joshua) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Za Zen Enterprises, LLC, in Los Angeles Superior Court on 4/12/2021, attached as Exhibit C. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE filed by defendant Grubhub Inc.. DEFENDANT GRUBHUB INC.'S NOTICE OF FILING OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH THE SUPERIOR COURT (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice to State Court)(Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Grubhub Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Notice of Appearance #5 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on May 18, 2021. (Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Joshua S Lipshutz on behalf of Defendant Grubhub Inc. (Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Grubhub Inc. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Grubhub Inc., (Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Grubhub Inc.. (Lipshutz, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 21STCV13874 Receipt No: ACACDC-31313945 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Grubhub Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Thomas J. Koreis, #2 Declaration of Joshua S. Lipshutz, #3 Exhibit A - Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit B - Summons, #5 Exhibit C - Complaint, #6 Exhibit D - Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Exhibit E - Notice of Case Assignment, #8 Exhibit F - Stipulations, #9 Exhibit G - ADR Information Package, #10 Exhibit H - Notice of Service of Process, #11 Exhibit I - Proof of Service) (Attorney Joshua S Lipshutz added to party Grubhub Inc.(pty:dft))(Lipshutz, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Za Zen Enterprises, LLC v. Grubhub Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Grubhub Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Joshua S Lipshutz |
| Represented By: | Joshua Seth Lipshutz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1 through 100 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Za-Zen Enterprises, LLC , Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, doing business as Shibumi | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Za-Zen Enterprises, LLC Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated doing business as Shibumi | |
| Represented By: | Alex Martin Outwater |
| Represented By: | Howard J Hirsch |
| Represented By: | Mark N Todzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
