Irina Baghdishyan v. New York Life Insurance Company et al
Irina Baghdishyan |
New York Life Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2021cv04160 |
May 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M Gee |
Sheri Pym |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant New York Life Insurance Company, (Tsui, Karen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant New York Life Insurance Company. (Tsui, Karen) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 20STCV14444 Receipt No: ACACDC-31319724 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant New York Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Karen T Tsui added to party New York Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Tsui, Karen) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, New York Life Insurance Company. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Irina Baghdishyan. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/15/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.