Rolando Bell v. Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Rolando Bell
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv04162
Filed: May 19, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING SECOND STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT #9 by Judge George H. Wu. ORDERS that Defendant JANG WOOK KIM, DDS INC. shall have up to and including August 9, 2021, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-captioned matter. (et)
July 9, 2021 Filing 9 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to August 9, 2021 re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 filed by Defendant Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mark R. Gibson in Support of Second Stipulation, #2 Proposed Order Granting Second Stipulation to Extend Time For Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)(Gibson, Mark)
June 9, 2021 Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc. answer now due 7/9/2021, filed by Defendant Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc..(Attorney Mark R Gibson added to party Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc.(pty:dft))(Gibson, Mark)
May 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
May 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, Granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #3 . (mba)
May 20, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
May 20, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa)
May 19, 2021 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Rolando Bell. (esa)
May 19, 2021 Filing 2 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Rolando Bell. (esa)
May 19, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc..Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, filed by plaintiff Rolando Bell. (Attachments: #1 CV 71, #2 summons req) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rolando Bell v. Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jang Wook Kim DDS, Inc.
Represented By: Arthur Walter Curley
Represented By: Mark R Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rolando Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?