Abdia Cabrales v. Dnata Aviation, Inc. et al
| Abdia Cabrales |
| Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Dnata US Inflight Catering, LLC and Dnata Aviation USA, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv04231 |
| May 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Dnata Aviation USA, Inc., Dnata US Inflight Catering, LLC, identifying Jackson Lewis, P.C. (counsel for DNATA); Alpha Flight Group Limited; Alpha Flight US, Inc.; Michele Savino (shareholder); Peter De Vito (shareholder); 121 Group Holdings LLC; DNATA US Inflight Catering LLC; Plaintiff Abdia Cabrales; The Dominguez Firm (counsel for Plaintiff). (Nakabayashi, Shannon) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening - optional html form, #5 . Document # 5 Due to clerical error. The docket clerk failed to attach the entire image of the new action. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 5/20/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 6] NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (ghap) Modified on 5/20/2021 (ghap). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants DNATA AVIATION USA, INC., DNATA US INFLIGHT CATERING, LLC. (Nakabayashi, Shannon) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV10302 Receipt No: ACACDC-31331593 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants DNATA US INFLIGHT CATERING, LLC, DNATA AVIATION USA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to the Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B to the Notice of Removal, #3 Declaration of Angela Bhojwani ISO Defendants Notice of Removal) (Attorney Shannon Bettis Nakabayashi added to party DNATA AVIATION USA, INC.(pty:dft), Attorney Shannon Bettis Nakabayashi added to party DNATA US INFLIGHT CATERING, LLC(pty:dft))(Nakabayashi, Shannon) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Dnata Aviation USA, Inc., Dnata US Inflight Catering, LLC, Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Abdia Cabrales. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/16/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 4) (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendants Dnata Aviation USA, Inc., Dnata US Inflight Catering, LLC.(SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.