Shaun A. Jones v. D. Taylor
| Shaun Antone Jones |
| D. Taylor |
| 2:2021cv04243 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Shaun Antone Jones. (hr) |
Filing 6
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE HIS APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #5 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. IT IS ORDERED that, no later than July 17, 2021, Plaintiff shall file either (1) a complete IFP application or (2) a signed Certificate of Authorized Officer and a Certified Trust Account Statement to complete his pending Request. IT IS ORDERED that, no later than July 7, 2021, Plaintiff shall file a Status Report with the Court (see document for further details). (Attachments: #1 CDCR 2015 IFP Memo re Obtaining Certified Trust Account Statement) (hr)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Shaun Antone Jones. (hr) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee, with leave to amend within 30 days. Plaintiff may re-submit the IFP application and Complaint to this Court, if submitted with the Certified Trust Account Statement and Disbursement Authorization. Plaintiff shall utilize the same case number. If plaintiff fails to submit the required documents within 30 days, this case shall be DISMISSED. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Reasons: Failure to authorize disbursements from prison trust account to pay the filing fees. Failure to sign IFP Request. Would recommend allowing 30 days leave to amend. (gk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Shaun Antone Jones. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendant D. Taylor pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson., filed by plaintiff Shaun Antone Jones. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shaun A. Jones v. D. Taylor | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shaun Antone Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: D. Taylor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
