Richard Rearley v. United States of America et al
Richard REARLEY |
2:2021cv04300 |
May 24, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Richard REARLEY. (Owen, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Richard REARLEY, (Owen, Andrew) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Richard REARLEY. (Owen, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31344000 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Richard REARLEY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification of Scope of Federal Employment) (Attorney Andrew P Owen added to party Richard REARLEY(pty:bkmov))(Owen, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Richard Rearley v. United States of America et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Richard REARLEY | |
Represented By: | Andrew P Owen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.