Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo v. Alyce Jean Lee et al
Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo |
Alyce Jean Lee individually; and as Trustee of the Lee Trust Dated February 10, 1992, Sub-Trust B, doing business as 1131 Sanborn, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
Leslie Rowan and 1311 Sanborn LLC |
Roes 1-10 |
2:2021cv04469 |
May 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
John F Walter |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. § 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement filed on July 28, 2021, Docket No. #20 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before October 27, 2021. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until October 27, 2021. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action,including the trial date are vacated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (et) |
Filing 20 NOTICE filed by defendant 1311 Sanborn LLC, Alyce Jean Lee, Leslie Rowan. (Daggenhurst, Richard) |
Filing 19 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, (Attorney Richard Geoffrey Daggenhurst added to party Does(pty:dft))(Daggenhurst, Richard) |
Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for August 30, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before August 16, 2021. (iv) |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #14 , #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Counsel must comply with L.R 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
Filing 16 First CROSSCLAIM against CROSS-DEFENDANT Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo, filed by CROSS-COMPLAINANTS Leslie Rowan, Alyce Jean Lee.(Daggenhurst, Richard) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Leslie Rowan.(Attorney Richard Geoffrey Daggenhurst added to party Leslie Rowan(pty:dft))(Daggenhurst, Richard) |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Alyce Jean Lee.(Attorney Richard Geoffrey Daggenhurst added to party Alyce Jean Lee(pty:dft))(Daggenhurst, Richard) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo, upon Defendant Alyce Jean Lee served on 6/5/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alyce Jean Lee in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo, upon Defendant Leslie Rowan served on 6/5/2021, answer due 6/28/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Leslie Rowan in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 11 DECLARATION of Craig P. Fagan Declaration of Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo. (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Alyce Jean Lee, Leslie Rowan. (iv) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Victoria Sangeun Eom Pyo. (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (esa) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Victoria Sanguen Eom Pyo, (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Victoria Sanguen Eom Pyo. (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Victoria Sanguen Eom Pyo. (Fagan, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31376547 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Victoria Sanguen Eom Pyo. (Attorney Craig P Fagan added to party Victoria Sanguen Eom Pyo(pty:pla))(Fagan, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.