George Jones v. L.A. Central Plaza LLC et al
| George Jones |
| Does 1-10 and L.A. Central Plaza LLC |
| 2:2021cv04547 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Mark C Scarsi |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (jgr)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Scheduling Conference set for 8/30/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (jgr)
|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant L.A. Central Plaza LLC, identifying No other interested party. (Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant L.A. Central Plaza LLC.(Attorney Stephen E Abraham added to party L.A. Central Plaza LLC(pty:dft))(Abraham, Stephen) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff George Jones, upon Defendant L.A. Central Plaza LLC served on 6/16/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon ENG AN - Agent Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Steven, Laura) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION. The Court has reviewed the Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Unruh Act and any other construction-related accessibility claim. The Court therefore dismisses any such claims without prejudice. (lc)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff George Jones to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive-form only-no proceeding held #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter Shahriari, #2 Declaration of George Jones)(Steven, Laura) |
| Filing 11 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (smo) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ADA) by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/16/2021. (smo)
|
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS Order re Prosecution of Certain Cases Under the Americans with Disabilities Act by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MARK C. SCARSI upon filing of the complaint by Judge Mark C. Scarsi. (smo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant L.A. Central Plaza LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Mark C. Scarsi and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff George Jones, (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Shahriari, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31395688 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff George Jones. (Attorney Peter Shahriari added to party George Jones (pty:pla))(Shahriari, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
