Bobby Aceves v. City of Long Beach et al
| Bobby Aceves |
| City of Long Beach, John Anthony Moran, Officer John Anthony Moran, Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Officer Edmund Moscoso (6164), Sergeant C. Nava and Officer Michael Parcells |
| 2:2021cv04625 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Long Beach, Does, Officer Edmund Moscoso (6164), Sergeant C. Nava, Officer Michael Parcells amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves(McRae, Lauren) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to John Anthony Moran answer now due 7/26/2021; City of Long Beach answer now due 7/26/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants CITY OF LONG BEACH and JOHN ANTHONY MORAN John Anthony Moran; City of Long Beach.(Attorney Matthew Millette Peters added to party City of Long Beach(pty:dft), Attorney Matthew Millette Peters added to party John Anthony Moran(pty:dft))(Peters, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves, upon Defendant City of Long Beach served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Alyssa Campos - Deputy City Clerk/Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of City of Long Beach - Long Beach City Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves, upon Defendant John Anthony Moran served on 6/15/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Cindy Martinez - Court Liaison Officer/Authorized to Accept, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of Officer John Anthony Moran (117457) in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. Carr, Peter (Carr, Peter) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City of Long Beach, John Anthony Moran. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves, identifying City of Long Beach, Long Beach Police Department, John Anthony Moran. (Neal, Na'Shaun) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves. (Neal, Na'Shaun) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves. (Neal, Na'Shaun) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31410879 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Bobby Aceves. (Attorney Na'Shaun Neal added to party Bobby Aceves(pty:pla))(Neal, Na'Shaun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
