Vinson Hall v. Daniel Fischer et al
| Vinson Hall |
| Daniel Fischer and Arseniy Dubnyakov |
| 2:2021cv04685 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Alka Sagar |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer that Hall take nothing and Hall's first amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) |
Filing 35
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer DENYING Defendant Daniel Fischers Motion to Dismiss as Moot and DISMISSING the Case (Dkt. #28 ). See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
|
Filing 34
TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR AND UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court, on its own motion, takes the Motion #28 set for Monday, September 13, 2021 off calendar and under submission. The Court will set a new hearing date if it decides oral argument would be helpful. A written order will follow. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 33 OPPOSITION to Motion to Dismiss Complaint #28 ; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall. (jp) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE filed by Defendant Daniel Fischer. notice of errata re 12(b)(6) motion.fischer.hall (Babachanian, Sarkis) |
| Filing 31 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #28 proposed order re motion to dismiss 12b6 by df.fischer.hall filed by Defendant Daniel Fischer. (Babachanian, Sarkis) |
| Filing 30 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #28 filed by Defendant Daniel Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit req for jud ntc Exh_A_20201215_minute_order_CERTIFIED.fischer.hall, #2 Exhibit req for jud ntc Exh_B_20201215_transcript_CERT.fischer.hall, #3 Exhibit req for jud ntc Exh_C_20201210_chro_petition_package_by_hall.fischer.hall, #4 Exhibit req for jud ntc Exh D 20100804 judgment re hall felony conviction)(Babachanian, Sarkis) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 9/27/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Daniel Fischer. Motion set for hearing on 9/13/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A - 20201215 CHRO minute order CERTIFIED.fischer.hall, #2 Exhibit Exh B - 20201215 CHRO hearing transcript CERTIFIED.fischer.hall, #3 Exhibit Exh C - 20201210 CHRO petition package by hall.fischer.hall) (Attorney Sarkis Jacob Babachanian added to party Daniel Fischer(pty:dft)) (Babachanian, Sarkis) |
| Filing 27 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall, upon Defendant Daniel Fischer served on 7/20/2021, answer due 8/10/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lindal Lala Fischer in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (jp) |
| Filing 26 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall, upon Defendant Arseniy Dubnyakov served on 7/20/2021, answer due 8/10/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon EW./Arseniy in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (jp) |
| Filing 25 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Arseniy Dubnyakov, Daniel Fischer amending Complaint #1 with Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Vinson Hall. (jp) |
|
Filing 24
Order DENYING Plaintiffs Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 16) by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The Court therefore DENIES his ex parte application. Hall may set this matter for a hearing on a preliminary injunction to be heard 28 days from the date that proper service is made on Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 23 PROOF OF SERVICE file by Plaintiff Vinson Hall upon Defendants Daniel Fischer, Arseniy Dubnyakov served on 6/30/2021 by mail re Complaint, Summons, Standing Order, Exhibit List, Exhibits, Civil Cover Sheet, Certification and Notice of Interested Parties, Ex Parte Application for TRO and OSC. (jp) |
| Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall, upon Defendant Arseniy Dubnyakov served on 6/30/2021, answer due 7/21/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Not indicated in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by mail copy to last know address. Original Summons NOT returned. (jp) |
| Filing 21 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall, upon Defendant Daniel Fischer. Date served is not indicated. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Not indicated in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by mail copy of last know address. Original Summons returned. (jp) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF ERRATA for the Exhibits attached to the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall. (jp) |
| Filing 19 PLAINTIFF'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in support of Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue #16 filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall. (jp) |
| Filing 18 FRANCISCO RAMOS AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in support of Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining and Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue #16 filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall. (jp) |
| Filing 17 DANIELLA RODRIGUEZ'S AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES in support of Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue #16 filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall. (jp) |
| Filing 16 PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause re: Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by plaintiff Vinson Hall. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4, #4 Part 5, #5 Part 6, #6 Part 7, #7 Part 8, #8 Proposed Order). (jp) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer DENYING Plaintiff's Request for a Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. #3 ). See Order for specifics. (jp)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall correcting Summons Issued #13 , Summons Issued #12 (jp) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Daniel Fischer. (jp) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Arseniy Dubnyakov. (jp) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dd)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| Filing 7 DECLARATION OF BERENICE VELIZ IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #3 (car) |
| Filing 6 DECLARATION OF DANIELLA RODRIGUEZ IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER #3 (car) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION OF FRANCISCO RAMOS IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #3 (car) |
| Filing 4 PLAINTIFF'S DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #3 . (car) |
| Filing 3 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF HIS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Vinson Hall Re: Complaint - (Discovery), #1 (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Defendants Arseniy Dubnyakov, Daniel Fischer. Case assigned to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar.(Filing fee $ 402 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Vinson Hall. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Complaint, #2 Part 3 of Complaint, #3 Part 4 of Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons 1, #6 Summons 2, #7 Proposed Order) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
