Bruce Eisenberg v. Luxury Brand Partners, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Bruce Eisenberg
Defendant: Smith and Cult, LLC, Revolve Group, Inc., Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, Inc., Luxury Brand Partners, LLC and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv04713
Filed: June 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2021 Filing 16 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Dismissal) (mrgo)
July 30, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Bruce Eisenberg. Dismissal is with prejudice. (Zerner, Lawrence)
June 11, 2021 Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Luxury Brand Partners, LLC. (mrgo)
June 11, 2021 Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Smith and Cult, LLC. (mrgo)
June 11, 2021 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, Inc. (mrgo)
June 11, 2021 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Revolve Group, Inc. (mrgo)
June 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
June 10, 2021 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request, #5 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #8 filed by plaintiff Bruce Eisenberg. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Smith and Cult, LLC, #2 Summons for Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, Inc., #3 Summons for Revolve Group, Inc.)(Zerner, Lawrence)
June 10, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request, #5 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap)
June 10, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
June 10, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap)
June 9, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bruce Eisenberg. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Smith and Cult, LLC, #2 Summons for Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, Inc., #3 Summons for Revolve Group, Inc.)(Zerner, Lawrence)
June 9, 2021 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bruce Eisenberg. (Zerner, Lawrence)
June 9, 2021 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Bruce Eisenberg. (Zerner, Lawrence)
June 9, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bruce Eisenberg, identifying Bruce Eisenberg, Tova Bonem, Luxury Brand Partners, LLC, Smith and Cult, LLC, Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, Inc., Revolve Group, Inc.. (Zerner, Lawrence)
June 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31437518 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Bruce Eisenberg. (Attorney Lawrence J Zerner added to party Bruce Eisenberg(pty:pla))(Zerner, Lawrence)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bruce Eisenberg v. Luxury Brand Partners, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith and Cult, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Revolve Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luxury Brand Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruce Eisenberg
Represented By: Lawrence J Zerner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?