Emilio Reyes v. Alexandra R. McIntosh et al
| Emilio Reyes |
| Does 1-10, Alexandra R. McIntosh, John Doe, Lorraine Ann Escobar an individual doing business as No Stone Unturned Genealogy, a proprietorship, Andrew Salas and Frances Muncy |
| 2:2021cv04780 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 #12 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED (see comments above). (lom)
|
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION RE: REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes. (mrgo) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: IFP APPLICATION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court directs Plaintiff to submit a supplemental statement explaining in more detail his income, expenses, assets, and liabilities. Plaintiffs supplemental statement will be due by July 29. After that, the Court will evaluate the IFP request. Alternatively, Plaintiff may decide to abandon the IFP request and simply pay the filing fee. If he chooses to do so, that payment will also be due by July 29. (See Minute Order for further details) re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #7 #9 . (vm)
|
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of of Plaintiff Emilio Reyes in support of EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60), #7 #9 filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes. (et) |
| Filing 9 PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION for Reconsideration re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #7 filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (et) |
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT against Defendants Andrew Salas, Frances Muncy amending Complaint - (Discovery) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes(et) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: denying #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case, filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes, (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants John Doe, Does, Lorraine Ann Escobar, Alexandra R. McIntosh. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Emilio Reyes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Request) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
