Carlos Chavez v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
| Carlos Chavez |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Timothy Ramey and Does 1 through 100 inclusive |
| 2:2021cv04817 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter unsigned from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV16180, received on 8/10/2021. (et)
|
|
Filing 22
TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (iv)
|
|
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND CASE TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT #10 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Motion is GRANTED. The action is REMANDED to Los Angeles County Superior Court. Although Plaintiff has prevailed on the Motion, Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs is DENIED. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (iv)
|
|
Filing 20
MINUTES OF TELEPHONIC MOTION FOR REMAND #10 held before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Case called, and counsel make their appearance. The Court invites counsel to present their oral arguments. Arguments by counsel are heard. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court takes the matter under submission. An order will issue. Court Reporter: Amy Diaz. (iv)
|
|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Pursuant to General Order 21-08, the Motion to Remand #10 and Scheduling Conference set for August 2, 2021 will be held telephonically at 11:00 a.m. Counsel shall use the following conference call information: Number: (888) 363-4734; Access Code: 5200572. Counsel are ordered to remain available from 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Any tentative ruling the Court may prepare, will be emailed to counsel prior to the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 18
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-10 days, filed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez.. (Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Joint Rule 26 Report #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events - Other Filings - Pretrial and Trial Documents -Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. Pursuant to the Court's 6/22/2021 Order, Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet is lacking. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate.
|
|
Filing 16
STATEMENT JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez (Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 15
REPLY Reply in Support of First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez. (Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 14
OPPOSITION to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 filed by Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Hearne, Heather)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF LODGING filed re First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #10 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Motion for Remand)(Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Remand #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Proposed orders not lodged with a main document shall be electronically lodged as an attachment to a Notice of Lodging. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv)
|
|
Filing 11
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez, (Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 10
First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez. Motion set for hearing on 8/2/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. Case number reads 21STCV16180. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv)
|
|
Filing 8
PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez, upon Defendant Timothy Ramey served on 6/17/2021, answer due 7/8/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Timothy Ramey in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Panitz, Eric)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 8/2/2021 at 11:00 AM. (iv)
|
|
Filing 6
ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation.(Hearne, Heather)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation, (Hearne, Heather)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Timothy Ramey, Schlumberger Technology Corporation., Does 1 through 100, inclusive, Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/29/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et)
|
|
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Executed by Plaintiff Carlos Chavez, upon Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation served on 5/13/2021, answer due 6/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lo Saecho agent for service of process for Schlumberger Technology Corporation in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 5/19/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO. 3 #1 ] (et)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation. (Hearne, Heather)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV16180 Receipt No: ACACDC-31460712 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Heather D. Hearne, #2 Exhibit State Court Complaint (Ex. 1 to Hearne Decl.), #3 Exhibit Service of Process Transmittals (Ex. 2 to Hearne Decl.), #4 Exhibit State Court Docket (Ex. 3 to Hearne Decl.), #5 Exhibit DFEH Complaint (Ex. 4 to Hearne Decl.), #6 Declaration Declaration of Jorge Andres Ortiz Donoso, #7 Declaration Declaration of Betty Marroquin, #8 Exhibit EMF (Marroquin Decl. Ex. 1)) (Attorney Heather D Hearne added to party Schlumberger Technology Corporation(pty:dft))(Hearne, Heather)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
