William Loftus et al v. Nationwide Tax Consulting LLC et al
| William Loftus |
| Does 1 through 10, inclusive, and each of them and Nationwide Tax Consulting LLC |
| 2:2021cv04924 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (jre)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nationwide Tax Consulting LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff William Loftus, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31483372 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff William Loftus. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party William Loftus(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
