Mediatek Inc. et al v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al
| MediaTek USA Inc. and Mediatek Inc. |
| NXP USA, Inc., Denso Ten America Limited, NXP Semiconductors N.V., Arrow Electronics, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC, Denso Ten Limited, Avnet, Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, Continental AG and Continental Automotive GmbH |
| 2:2021cv04969 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| George H Wu |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eric C. Green to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31799835) #30 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(a) Application not complete: state courts to which the applicant has been admitted are not listed. Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): The attorney seeking to appear pro hac vice must complete Section 1 of this Application, personally sign, in ink, the certification in Section II, and have the designated Local Counsel sign in Section III. ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES ARE NOT ACCEPTED. See Instructions for Applicants (1) (G-64). (lt) |
| Filing 30 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Eric C. Green to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31799835) filed by Defendants NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Ben-Meir, David) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance, #26 , Notice of Appearance, #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance of Withdrawal of Counsel G123.. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Brian A Sun on behalf of Defendants Arrow Electronics, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC (Attorney Brian A Sun added to party Arrow Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Brian A Sun added to party Robert Bosch LLC(pty:dft))(Sun, Brian) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David H Ben-Meir on behalf of Defendants Arrow Electronics, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC (Attorney David H Ben-Meir added to party Arrow Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney David H Ben-Meir added to party Robert Bosch LLC(pty:dft))(Ben-Meir, David) |
Filing 29
ORDER REGARDING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days) #25 . Defendants' Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avnet, Inc., NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC deadline to file their responsive pleading to the complaint shall be October 11, 2021. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 25 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 10/11/2021 filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting)(Pak, Sean) |
| Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Brian A Sun counsel for Defendants NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc.. Adding Brian A. Sun as counsel of record for NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA, Inc.. (Attorney Brian A Sun added to party NXP Semiconductors N.V.(pty:dft), Attorney Brian A Sun added to party NXP USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Sun, Brian) |
| Filing 23 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney David H Ben-Meir counsel for Defendants NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc.. Adding David H. Ben-Meir as counsel of record for NXP Semiconductors N.V. and NXP USA, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant NXP Semiconductor N.V. and NXP USA, Inc.. (Attorney David H Ben-Meir added to party NXP Semiconductors N.V.(pty:dft), Attorney David H Ben-Meir added to party NXP USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Ben-Meir, David) |
| Filing 22 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 10/11/2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pak, Sean) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) by Judge George H. Wu re Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #17 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The deadline to respond to the complaint for defendant Denso Ten America Ltd is continued until August 12, 2021. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) by Judge George H. Wu re: #16 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: the deadline to respond to the complaint for defendant Robert Bosch LLC is continued to 8/12/2021. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lance L Yang counsel for Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. Adding Lance L. Yang as counsel of record for MediaTek Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Attorney Lance L. Yang. (Attorney Lance L Yang added to party MediaTek USA Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Lance L Yang added to party Mediatek Inc.(pty:pla))(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Arrow Electronics, Inc. answer now due 8/12/2021; Avnet, Inc. answer now due 8/12/2021; NXP USA, Inc. answer now due 8/12/2021, filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc.; Mediatek Inc..(Pak, Sean) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Denso Ten America Limited answer now due 8/12/2021, filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc.; Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pak, Sean) |
| Filing 16 APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 8/12/2021 filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pak, Sean) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant NXP USA, Inc. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaitlyn Mannix, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Denso Ten America Limited served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Robert Bosch LLC served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaitlyn Mannix, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Avnet, Inc. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Arrow Electronics, Inc. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jennifer Lee, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Case transferred from Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:21-cv-04969 GW(AFMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avnet, Inc., Continental AG, Continental Automotive GmbH, Denso Ten America Limited, Denso Ten Limited, MediaTek USA Inc., NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31489427 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (Attorney Kevin P. B. Johnson added to party MediaTek USA Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin P. B. Johnson added to party Mediatek Inc.(pty:pla))(Johnson, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
