Mediatek Inc. et al v. NXP Semiconductors N.V. et al
| MediaTek USA Inc. and Mediatek Inc. |
| NXP USA, Inc., NXP Semiconductors N.V., Arrow Electronics, Inc., Robert Bosch LLC, Avnet, Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, Continental AG and Continental Automotive GmbH |
| 2:2021cv04970 |
| June 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER RE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR A MANDATORY STAY UNDER 28 USC SECTION 1659 (DKT. #23 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Motion is GRANTED. This case is stayed until the determination of the ITC's Investigation No. 337-TA-1272 (the "Investigation") becomes final. While this case is stayed, the parties shall file a joint status report every 90 days as to the status of the Investigation. (jp)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending ITC Proceedings filed by Defendants Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avnet, Inc., Continental AG, Continental Automotive GmbH, NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/8/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Continental AG(pty:dft), Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Continental Automotive GmbH(pty:dft), Attorney Steven John Corr added to party NXP Semiconductors N.V.(pty:dft), Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Robert Bosch GmbH(pty:dft), Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Robert Bosch LLC(pty:dft)) (Corr, Steven) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3) (DKT. #18 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. The deadline to respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned case for Defendants NXP USA, Inc., Avnet, Inc., and Arrow Electronics, Inc., is continued to 8/12/2021 (jp)
|
| Filing 21 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Avnet, Inc. (Corr, Steven) |
| Filing 20 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Arrow Electronics, Inc. identifying BLACKROCK, INC. as Corporate Parent. (Corr, Steven) |
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Lance L Yang counsel for Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. Adding Lance L. Yang as counsel of record for MediaTek, Inc. and MediaTek USA Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Attorney Lance L. Yang. (Attorney Lance L Yang added to party MediaTek USA Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Lance L Yang added to party Mediatek Inc.(pty:pla))(Yang, Lance) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 8/12/2021 filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pak, Sean) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant NXP USA, Inc. identifying NXP Semiconductors N.V.; NXP B. V.; FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR HOLDINGS V, INC. as Corporate Parent. (Corr, Steven) |
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by Defendants Arrow Electronics, Inc., NXP USA, Inc., Avnet, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 8-3))(Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Arrow Electronics, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Steven John Corr added to party Avnet, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Steven John Corr added to party NXP USA, Inc.(pty:dft))(Corr, Steven) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant NXP USA, Inc. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaitlyn Mannix, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Robert Bosch LLC served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kaitlyn Mannix, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Avnet, Inc. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., upon Defendant Arrow Electronics, Inc. served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jennifer Lee, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Johnson, Kevin) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. Case transferred from Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:21-cv-04970 JAK(AFMx). (rn)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 as to Defendants Arrow Electronics, Inc., Avnet, Inc., Continental AG, Continental Automotive GmbH, NXP Semiconductors N.V., NXP USA, Inc., Robert Bosch GmbH, Robert Bosch LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc., (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31489474 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs MediaTek USA Inc., Mediatek Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18) (Attorney Kevin P. B. Johnson added to party MediaTek USA Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Kevin P. B. Johnson added to party Mediatek Inc.(pty:pla))(Johnson, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
