Garbis Iclisoy v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company et al
| Garbis Iclisoy |
| The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan and Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company |
| 2:2021cv05003 |
| June 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| John E McDermott |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. § 1001 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.. (Torrence, Francis) |
Filing 19
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANT THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Party, #18 . The Court, for good cause appearing and pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties, hereby dismisses Defendant THE NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC. GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN (the "Plan") from this case, without prejudice. Plaintiff and the Plan shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs directly related to this Stipulation and the dismissal of the Plan, and Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company shall remain the only named defendant in this action. The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan terminated. (mrgo)
|
| Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan filed by Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order to Dismiss Defendant Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan)(Thomas, Dominique) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #16 . (mrgo)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 09/01/2021 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Thomas, Dominique) |
| Filing 15 Second STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan answer now due 8/11/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan.(Thomas, Dominique) |
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [FRCP 16, 26(f)] ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. (Scheduling Conference set for 8/30/2021 at 10:30 AM before Judge Percy Anderson.) (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company (Torrence, Francis) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.(Attorney Francis J Torrence added to party Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Torrence, Francis) |
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan answer now due 7/28/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan.(Attorney Dominique N Thomas added to party The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan(pty:dft))(Thomas, Dominique) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garbis Iclisoy, upon Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company served on 6/23/2021, answer due 7/14/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Daisy Montengro, C.T. Corp Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Horrow, Michael) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Garbis Iclisoy, upon Defendant The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan served on 6/23/2021, answer due 7/14/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Aaliyah Wamsley- Agent for CT Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Horrow, Michael) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan. (Attachments: #1 Summons for The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan) (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Garbis Iclisoy, identifying Garbis Iclisoy, Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Plan. (Horrow, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Garbis Iclisoy. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request)(Horrow, Michael) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Garbis Iclisoy. (Horrow, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31491266 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Garbis Iclisoy. (Attorney Michael B Horrow added to party Garbis Iclisoy(pty:pla))(Horrow, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
