Anush Mirzoyan v. Merrick Garland et al
| Anush MIRZOYAN |
| US CIS, AJELANDRO MAYORKAS, JOHN DOE 1-10, Merrick Garland, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and Tracy Renaud |
| Ken Cuccinelli and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv05033 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REMAND FOR ADJUDICATION OF NATURALIZATION APPLICATION AND TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE #12 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff's N-400 naturalization application is remanded to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for adjudication. This action will be dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Each party shall bear his, her, or its own attorney's fees, costs and expenses. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (iv) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION to Remand Case to US Agency Stipulation To Remand For Adjudication Of Naturalization Application And To Dismiss Action Without Prejudice filed by Defendant Ken Cuccinelli, Merrick Garland, Ajelandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, US CIS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Ken Cuccinelli(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Merrick Garland(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Ajelandro Mayorkas(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party Tracy Renaud(pty:res), Attorney Joanne I Osinoff added to party US CIS(pty:res))(Osinoff, Joanne) |
Filing 11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv)
|
| Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Anush Mirzoyan, served on 06/25/2021. (Sarian, Artem) |
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Repondents Ken Cuccinelli, Merrick Garland, Ajelandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud, US CIS. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Anush MIRZOYAN, (Sarian, Artem) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Anush MIRZOYAN. (Sarian, Artem) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #3 filed by Plaintiff Anush MIRZOYAN. (Sarian, Artem) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Artem Sarian counsel for Plaintiff Anush MIRZOYAN. Adding Artem M Sarian as counsel of record for Anush Mirzoyan for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Anush Mirzoyan Plaintiff. (Attorney Artem Sarian added to party Anush MIRZOYAN(pty:pla))(Sarian, Artem) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (402 paid on 06/21/2021, receipt number 31497633), filed by Plaintiff Anush MIRZOYAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachments to Petition)(Sarian, Artem) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31497633 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Anush MIRZOYAN. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachments to Petition)(Sarian, Artem) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
